- Managing human resources 8th edition Download Book Managing Human Resources 8th Edition in PDF format. You can Read Online Managing Human Resources 8th Edition here in PDF, EPUB, Mobi or Docx formats.
- Oct 26, 2018 - Resources - Free Ebooks download PDF. Resources 17th Edition. The book is PDF Version and can be downloaded.
Cara download game untuk komputer. How to install joyetech neo se advanced controller driver windows 7 free. Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. https://ksfefm.weebly.com/blog/the-game-all-that-lady-download. Managing Human Resources 18th Edition. Snell Managing Human Resources (17th Seventeenth Edition) [Hardcover.
![Managing human resources 17th edition free download pc Managing human resources 17th edition free download pc](https://testmango.com/wp-content/uploads/Mathis-13th-Human-Resource-Management-053845315X-180x230.jpg)
Managing Human Resources Book Pdf
![Resources Resources](/uploads/1/3/3/8/133890531/332397839.jpg)
17th Edition Courses
Gain a better understanding of how human resources impacts both individuals and organizations with this market-leading, practical text. Snell/Morris/Bohlander's popular MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES, 17TH EDITION builds upon a foundation of research and theory with an inviting, practical framework that focuses on today's most critical HR issues and current practices. The book's engaging writing style and strong visual design use more than 500 memorable examples from a variety of real organizations to illustrate key points and connect concepts to current HR practice. Fresh examples spotlight the latest developments and critical trends, while hands-on applications focus on practical tips and suggestions for success.
Sample questions asked in the 17th edition of Managing Human Resources:
Misplaced Affections: Discharge for Sexual Harassment Peter Lewiston was terminated on July 15, 2008, by the governing board of the Pine Circle Unified School District (PCUSD) for violation of the district’s sexual harassment policy. Prior to Lewiston’s termination he was a senior maintenance employee with an above-average work record who had worked for the PCUSD for eleven years. He had been a widower since 2003 and was described by his coworkers as a friendly, outgoing, but lonely individual. Beverly Gilbury was a fifth-grade teacher working in the district’s Advanced Learning Program. She was twenty-eight years old and married and had worked for PCUSD for six years. At the time of the incidents, Lewiston and Gilbury both worked at the Simpson Elementary School, where their relationship was described as “cooperative.” The following sequence of events was reported separately by Lewiston and Gilbury during the district’s investigation of this sexual harassment case. Gilbury reported that her relationship with Lewiston began to change during the last month of the 2007–2008 school year. She believed that Lewiston was paying her more attention and that his behavior was “out of the ordinary” and “sometimes weird.” He began spending more time in her classroom talking with the children and with her. At the time she did not say anything to Lewiston because “I didn’t want to hurt his feelings since he is a nice, lonely, older man.” However, on May 25, when Lewiston told Gilbury that he was “very fond” of her and that she had “very beautiful eyes,” she replied, “Remember, Peter, we’re just friends.” For the remainder of the school year, there was little contact between them; however, when they did see each other, Lewiston seemed “overly friendly” to her. June 7, 2008. On the first day of summer school, Gilbury returned to school to find a dozen roses and a card from Lewiston. The card read, “Please forgive me for thinking you could like me. I played the big fool. Yours always, P.L.” Later in the day Lewiston asked Gilbury to lunch. She replied, “It’s been a long time since anyone sent me roses, but I can’t go to lunch. We need to remain just friends.” Gilbury told another teacher that she was uncomfortable about receiving the roses and card and that Lewiston would not leave her alone. She expressed concern that Lewiston might get “more romantic” with her. June 8, 2008. Gilbury arrived at school to find another card from Lewiston. Inside was a handwritten note that read, “I hope you can someday return my affections for you. I need you so much.” Later in the day, Lewiston again asked her to lunch, and she declined saying, “I’m a happily married woman.” At the close of the school day, when Gilbury went to her car, Lewiston suddenly appeared. He asked to explain himself but Gilbury became agitated and shouted, “I have to leave right now.” Lewiston reached inside the car, supposedly to pat her shoulder, but touched her head instead. She believed he meant to stroke her hair. He stated that he was only trying to calm her down. She drove away, very upset. June 9, 2008. Gilbury received another card and a lengthy letter from Lewiston, stating that he was wrong in trying to develop a relationship with her and he hoped they could still remain friends. He wished her all happiness with her family and job. June 11, 2008. Gilbury obtained from the Western Justice Court an injunction prohibiting sexual harassment by Lewiston. Shortly thereafter Lewiston appealed the injunction. A notice was mailed to Gilbury giving the dates of the appeal hearing. The notice stated in part, “If you fail to appear, the injunction may be vacated and the petition dismissed.” Gilbury failed to appear at the hearing, and the injunction was set aside. Additionally, on June 11 she had filed with the district’s EEOC officer a sexual harassment complaint against Lewiston. After the investigation, the district concluded that Lewiston’s actions created an “extremely sexually hostile” environment for Gilbury. The investigative report recommended dismissal based upon the grievous conduct of Lewiston and the initial injunction granted by the Justice Court. Questions 1. Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOC’s definition of sexual harassment. 2. Should the intent or motive behind Lewiston’s conduct be considered when deciding sexual harassment activities? Explain. 3. If you were the district’s EEOC officer, what would you conclude? What disciplinary action, if any, would you take? Source: This case is adapted from an actual arbitration hearing conducted by George Bohlander. The background information is factual. All names are fictitious
United States Auto Industry Back on Top … of CEO Pay During the financial crisis, many executives’ pay was stifled, reduced, or even withheld. Among the hardest hit—the U.S. auto industry. Shareholder groups, union leaders, political officials, and the general public all demanded change in the way auto industry executives were getting rich while their cars were getting poor. For example, Ford made some major cuts for its executives and its mployees. This is why people were shocked to find out that for 2011 the CEO of Ford, Alan Mulally, was to receive $56.5 million in stock awards. It is one of the richest pay packages ever given to a top executive in the auto industry … and it is even after all the clamor over sky-high executive paychecks. Is it too much? That depends on who you ask. For most, it seems unreasonable that a boss would make more than 1,000 times the pay of their average worker. However, if you ask Ford workers who have seen Mulally steer Ford back from the edge of bankruptcy, they probably would not complain too much. If you asked Ford’s shareholders, it would be hard for them to overlook the fact that Ford shares have gone from $1.56 when Mullaly first took over to $14 a share. If you ask Ford dealers, they may be too busy selling one of the strongest lineups of cars around to answer. Of course, no one really knows if Ford would have been sitting in such a good position regardless of Mulally. On one hand, there are plenty of factors, such as a national economic recovery, that led to Ford’s improvements that Mullaly clearly could not have had a finger on. On the other hand, there are plenty of companies that would be willing to pay $50 million if they knew their company would rebound as Ford has under Mulally. Questions 1. Are CEOs and key corporate executives worth the large pay packages they receive? Explain. 2. Do you agree with Peter Drucker that corporate executives should receive compensation packages no larger than a certain percentage of the pay of hourly workers? Explain. 3. Will the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act giving shareholders the right to vote on executive pay influence the size of these packages in the future? Explain. Source: Adapted from Phil LeBeau, “Mulally and Bill Ford Collect $100 Million Pay Package,” CNBC , (March 8, 2011).
Suppose that you are the manager of an accounts receivable unit in a large company. You are switching to a new system of billing and record-keeping and need to train your three supervisors and twenty-eight employees in the new procedures. What training method(s) would you use? Why?
Rambo Goes Violent The facts of the case are straightforward. A shop floor dispute at an automobile parts manufacturing plant in Hamilton, Iowa, ended with one worker killing another. At about 2:00 p.m. on August 12, 2011, police responded to a report of a fight that erupted between two employees. When members of the Hamilton Police Department’s Violent Crime Unit arrived, they found Mark Lomas seriously injured. Lomas, thirty, died three hours later at Good Samaritan Memorial Hospital. The other employee, Thomas Waycross, was charged with second-degree murder. During the investigation of the incident, employees noted that Lomas and Waycross often “bickered” when working together. One employee remarked that Waycross liked to “act tough.” Another employee claimed that Waycross had a “Rambo-type” personality. It was widely known that management had told both employees to “learn to get along” or quit. When asked about the incident, police spokesperson Kathy Calder remarked, “Employers must be vigilant when monitoring for signs of potential workplace violence.” Nancy Lomas, Mark’s wife, has filed a negligence lawsuit against the company. Questions 1. What are some violence indicators an employee might display? 2. What are some actions management can take to help prevent workplace violence? 3. How can employees protect themselves against workplace violence? Source: Adapted from a case known to the authors. All names and locations are fictitious.
Employee Selection and Training at Meadowbrook Golf and Golf Ventures West Meadowbrook Golf, headquartered in Championsgate, Florida, is a leader in golf course management, maintenance, and supplies in the United States. Today the organization is comprised of four companies that meet the demands of the market: Meadowbrook Golf provides the management, International Golf Maintenance provides the maintenance, and Golf Ventures East and West are the golf supply arms of the business. Ron Jackson is the CEO of Meadowbrook. The turf business is a highly specialized, tight-knit industry. The company’s strong reputation was built on its expertise in providing superior products and services to golf courses and municipalities. Ron knew the only way he could take the company to the next level was to not only find the right people with the specific experience they needed but to find a way to keep them happy and motivated so they would stay. Jackson learned of a behavioral assessment tool called Predictive Index, produced by the Wellesley, Massachusetts-based management consulting company PI Worldwide, and brought it into Meadowbrook as a way to help the managers understand what motivated their employees to come to work every day. By obtaining this insight, Jackson says Meadowbrook was able to keep its talent by “managing them for their individual success.” Meadowbrook also realized that their top performers possessed very similar behavioral characteristics. Using this information, Meadowbrook was able to incorporate this information into its hiring process. Golf Ventures West (GVW), the supply division of Meadowbrook in the western United States, offers equipment that ranges from a string trimmer to a $70,000 rotary motor, along with fertilizer, seed, and specialty products. Mike Eastwood, the president of GVW, had the best talent in the industry, long-time clients, and very low turnover. While it all seemed idealistic, Eastwood had a problem. He needed his team to sell more. The challenge was how to identify what they needed in sales training to help them grow their sales. In sharing his concerns with Jackson, Eastwood learned that the publishers of the Predictive Index also offered a selling training tool that identified the strengths of salespeople and areas for their development as well as offered customer-focused sales (CFS) training. To explore the tool further, he and his senior management team took the assessment themselves. The results accurately identified Eastwood’s selling style. His general managers, most with over 30 years in the industry, scored in the mid to high range. Next, Eastwood gave his sales team members the assessment. However, their overall scores were in the mid-to-low range. Eastwood quickly realized that despite the talent of his sales team, 80 percent of them did not know how to sell. The results of the assessment showed most of them were not asking enough investigative questions when speaking with their clients. This was a huge breakthrough. Eastwood’s team members then took the CFS workshop to learn how to think like customers do and investigate and uncover their needs. The results? “My most senior and successful salesperson followed the CFS process and closed a $40,000 deal with a customer that had only purchased from our competitor for the last ten years,” says Eastwood. In another instance, Eastwood had a salesperson who was underperforming but knew he had the potential to be successful. This salesperson went through the sales training and was moved to a new territory. “In four months he has sold more in his new territory than he had in a year in his original territory,” says Eastwood. Apparently, the training is paying off. Even though golf courses, in general, have been struggling in recent years, Golf Ventures West has expanded its operations to a number of new locations across the country. Questions 1. Why did Eastwood and his general managers take PI’s competency assessment prior to administering it to the company’s other salespeople? 2. How did the assessment help uncover the skills gap handicapping Golf Ventures West’s salespeople? 3. What does the case indicate about the training “readiness” of the company’s salespeople? Source: Adapted from “Hire Smart, Develop Selling Skills and Manage for Individual and Team Success” PI Worldwide, accessed June 21, 2011 at http://www.piworldwide.com. (This case is based on press release-type information on the company’s website. Phone: 800-832-8884 or [email protected] .)
Virtual Teams in Action: Building the F-35 Fighter The F-35 Lighting II Program, also known as the Joint Fighter Program, is the U.S. Department of Defense’s next generation stealth fighter aircraft. The Department of Defense named Lockheed Martin Aeronautics of Fort Worth, Texas, to design and build the fighter with Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems as major partners Countries, including Italy, Australia, Canada, Turkey, India, and Israel, have contributed toward development costs of the program. The success of the mega project hinges greatly on intricate teamwork and the cooperation of countless individuals. For example, more than 80 suppliers worked at 187 locations worldwide to build components for the fighter. A seventy-five member technology group at Lockheed’s aeronautics division linked the suppliers along with the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marines to Britain’s Defense Ministry to track progress and make midstream design and production changes. Individuals working at more than 40,000 computer stations collaborated to get the first plane airborne in just four years. Speaking of the teamwork involved, Mark Peden, vice president for information systems at Lockheed Aeronautics, said, “It’s the true virtual connection.” Teams working both nationally and internationally were connected as if team members were working in the same room. Teams communicated via their computers while looking at shared documents, carried on e-mail chats, and used electronic whiteboards on which geographically separated team members could draw pictures or charts, in real time, as others watched and responded. The Internet was designed to allow people from different companies with incompatible computing systems to interface on websites that speak a common language. Questions 1. What advantages did Lockheed Martin gain by using virtual teams? Explain. 2. Identify and discuss potential problems with using virtual teams—for example, interpersonal, technical, or geographical concerns. 3. Discuss the characteristics that virtual team members should possess. 4. What specific training should virtual teams receive?
Sample questions asked in the 17th edition of Managing Human Resources:
Misplaced Affections: Discharge for Sexual Harassment Peter Lewiston was terminated on July 15, 2008, by the governing board of the Pine Circle Unified School District (PCUSD) for violation of the district’s sexual harassment policy. Prior to Lewiston’s termination he was a senior maintenance employee with an above-average work record who had worked for the PCUSD for eleven years. He had been a widower since 2003 and was described by his coworkers as a friendly, outgoing, but lonely individual. Beverly Gilbury was a fifth-grade teacher working in the district’s Advanced Learning Program. She was twenty-eight years old and married and had worked for PCUSD for six years. At the time of the incidents, Lewiston and Gilbury both worked at the Simpson Elementary School, where their relationship was described as “cooperative.” The following sequence of events was reported separately by Lewiston and Gilbury during the district’s investigation of this sexual harassment case. Gilbury reported that her relationship with Lewiston began to change during the last month of the 2007–2008 school year. She believed that Lewiston was paying her more attention and that his behavior was “out of the ordinary” and “sometimes weird.” He began spending more time in her classroom talking with the children and with her. At the time she did not say anything to Lewiston because “I didn’t want to hurt his feelings since he is a nice, lonely, older man.” However, on May 25, when Lewiston told Gilbury that he was “very fond” of her and that she had “very beautiful eyes,” she replied, “Remember, Peter, we’re just friends.” For the remainder of the school year, there was little contact between them; however, when they did see each other, Lewiston seemed “overly friendly” to her. June 7, 2008. On the first day of summer school, Gilbury returned to school to find a dozen roses and a card from Lewiston. The card read, “Please forgive me for thinking you could like me. I played the big fool. Yours always, P.L.” Later in the day Lewiston asked Gilbury to lunch. She replied, “It’s been a long time since anyone sent me roses, but I can’t go to lunch. We need to remain just friends.” Gilbury told another teacher that she was uncomfortable about receiving the roses and card and that Lewiston would not leave her alone. She expressed concern that Lewiston might get “more romantic” with her. June 8, 2008. Gilbury arrived at school to find another card from Lewiston. Inside was a handwritten note that read, “I hope you can someday return my affections for you. I need you so much.” Later in the day, Lewiston again asked her to lunch, and she declined saying, “I’m a happily married woman.” At the close of the school day, when Gilbury went to her car, Lewiston suddenly appeared. He asked to explain himself but Gilbury became agitated and shouted, “I have to leave right now.” Lewiston reached inside the car, supposedly to pat her shoulder, but touched her head instead. She believed he meant to stroke her hair. He stated that he was only trying to calm her down. She drove away, very upset. June 9, 2008. Gilbury received another card and a lengthy letter from Lewiston, stating that he was wrong in trying to develop a relationship with her and he hoped they could still remain friends. He wished her all happiness with her family and job. June 11, 2008. Gilbury obtained from the Western Justice Court an injunction prohibiting sexual harassment by Lewiston. Shortly thereafter Lewiston appealed the injunction. A notice was mailed to Gilbury giving the dates of the appeal hearing. The notice stated in part, “If you fail to appear, the injunction may be vacated and the petition dismissed.” Gilbury failed to appear at the hearing, and the injunction was set aside. Additionally, on June 11 she had filed with the district’s EEOC officer a sexual harassment complaint against Lewiston. After the investigation, the district concluded that Lewiston’s actions created an “extremely sexually hostile” environment for Gilbury. The investigative report recommended dismissal based upon the grievous conduct of Lewiston and the initial injunction granted by the Justice Court. Questions 1. Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOC’s definition of sexual harassment. 2. Should the intent or motive behind Lewiston’s conduct be considered when deciding sexual harassment activities? Explain. 3. If you were the district’s EEOC officer, what would you conclude? What disciplinary action, if any, would you take? Source: This case is adapted from an actual arbitration hearing conducted by George Bohlander. The background information is factual. All names are fictitious
United States Auto Industry Back on Top … of CEO Pay During the financial crisis, many executives’ pay was stifled, reduced, or even withheld. Among the hardest hit—the U.S. auto industry. Shareholder groups, union leaders, political officials, and the general public all demanded change in the way auto industry executives were getting rich while their cars were getting poor. For example, Ford made some major cuts for its executives and its mployees. This is why people were shocked to find out that for 2011 the CEO of Ford, Alan Mulally, was to receive $56.5 million in stock awards. It is one of the richest pay packages ever given to a top executive in the auto industry … and it is even after all the clamor over sky-high executive paychecks. Is it too much? That depends on who you ask. For most, it seems unreasonable that a boss would make more than 1,000 times the pay of their average worker. However, if you ask Ford workers who have seen Mulally steer Ford back from the edge of bankruptcy, they probably would not complain too much. If you asked Ford’s shareholders, it would be hard for them to overlook the fact that Ford shares have gone from $1.56 when Mullaly first took over to $14 a share. If you ask Ford dealers, they may be too busy selling one of the strongest lineups of cars around to answer. Of course, no one really knows if Ford would have been sitting in such a good position regardless of Mulally. On one hand, there are plenty of factors, such as a national economic recovery, that led to Ford’s improvements that Mullaly clearly could not have had a finger on. On the other hand, there are plenty of companies that would be willing to pay $50 million if they knew their company would rebound as Ford has under Mulally. Questions 1. Are CEOs and key corporate executives worth the large pay packages they receive? Explain. 2. Do you agree with Peter Drucker that corporate executives should receive compensation packages no larger than a certain percentage of the pay of hourly workers? Explain. 3. Will the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act giving shareholders the right to vote on executive pay influence the size of these packages in the future? Explain. Source: Adapted from Phil LeBeau, “Mulally and Bill Ford Collect $100 Million Pay Package,” CNBC , (March 8, 2011).
Suppose that you are the manager of an accounts receivable unit in a large company. You are switching to a new system of billing and record-keeping and need to train your three supervisors and twenty-eight employees in the new procedures. What training method(s) would you use? Why?
Rambo Goes Violent The facts of the case are straightforward. A shop floor dispute at an automobile parts manufacturing plant in Hamilton, Iowa, ended with one worker killing another. At about 2:00 p.m. on August 12, 2011, police responded to a report of a fight that erupted between two employees. When members of the Hamilton Police Department’s Violent Crime Unit arrived, they found Mark Lomas seriously injured. Lomas, thirty, died three hours later at Good Samaritan Memorial Hospital. The other employee, Thomas Waycross, was charged with second-degree murder. During the investigation of the incident, employees noted that Lomas and Waycross often “bickered” when working together. One employee remarked that Waycross liked to “act tough.” Another employee claimed that Waycross had a “Rambo-type” personality. It was widely known that management had told both employees to “learn to get along” or quit. When asked about the incident, police spokesperson Kathy Calder remarked, “Employers must be vigilant when monitoring for signs of potential workplace violence.” Nancy Lomas, Mark’s wife, has filed a negligence lawsuit against the company. Questions 1. What are some violence indicators an employee might display? 2. What are some actions management can take to help prevent workplace violence? 3. How can employees protect themselves against workplace violence? Source: Adapted from a case known to the authors. All names and locations are fictitious.
Employee Selection and Training at Meadowbrook Golf and Golf Ventures West Meadowbrook Golf, headquartered in Championsgate, Florida, is a leader in golf course management, maintenance, and supplies in the United States. Today the organization is comprised of four companies that meet the demands of the market: Meadowbrook Golf provides the management, International Golf Maintenance provides the maintenance, and Golf Ventures East and West are the golf supply arms of the business. Ron Jackson is the CEO of Meadowbrook. The turf business is a highly specialized, tight-knit industry. The company’s strong reputation was built on its expertise in providing superior products and services to golf courses and municipalities. Ron knew the only way he could take the company to the next level was to not only find the right people with the specific experience they needed but to find a way to keep them happy and motivated so they would stay. Jackson learned of a behavioral assessment tool called Predictive Index, produced by the Wellesley, Massachusetts-based management consulting company PI Worldwide, and brought it into Meadowbrook as a way to help the managers understand what motivated their employees to come to work every day. By obtaining this insight, Jackson says Meadowbrook was able to keep its talent by “managing them for their individual success.” Meadowbrook also realized that their top performers possessed very similar behavioral characteristics. Using this information, Meadowbrook was able to incorporate this information into its hiring process. Golf Ventures West (GVW), the supply division of Meadowbrook in the western United States, offers equipment that ranges from a string trimmer to a $70,000 rotary motor, along with fertilizer, seed, and specialty products. Mike Eastwood, the president of GVW, had the best talent in the industry, long-time clients, and very low turnover. While it all seemed idealistic, Eastwood had a problem. He needed his team to sell more. The challenge was how to identify what they needed in sales training to help them grow their sales. In sharing his concerns with Jackson, Eastwood learned that the publishers of the Predictive Index also offered a selling training tool that identified the strengths of salespeople and areas for their development as well as offered customer-focused sales (CFS) training. To explore the tool further, he and his senior management team took the assessment themselves. The results accurately identified Eastwood’s selling style. His general managers, most with over 30 years in the industry, scored in the mid to high range. Next, Eastwood gave his sales team members the assessment. However, their overall scores were in the mid-to-low range. Eastwood quickly realized that despite the talent of his sales team, 80 percent of them did not know how to sell. The results of the assessment showed most of them were not asking enough investigative questions when speaking with their clients. This was a huge breakthrough. Eastwood’s team members then took the CFS workshop to learn how to think like customers do and investigate and uncover their needs. The results? “My most senior and successful salesperson followed the CFS process and closed a $40,000 deal with a customer that had only purchased from our competitor for the last ten years,” says Eastwood. In another instance, Eastwood had a salesperson who was underperforming but knew he had the potential to be successful. This salesperson went through the sales training and was moved to a new territory. “In four months he has sold more in his new territory than he had in a year in his original territory,” says Eastwood. Apparently, the training is paying off. Even though golf courses, in general, have been struggling in recent years, Golf Ventures West has expanded its operations to a number of new locations across the country. Questions 1. Why did Eastwood and his general managers take PI’s competency assessment prior to administering it to the company’s other salespeople? 2. How did the assessment help uncover the skills gap handicapping Golf Ventures West’s salespeople? 3. What does the case indicate about the training “readiness” of the company’s salespeople? Source: Adapted from “Hire Smart, Develop Selling Skills and Manage for Individual and Team Success” PI Worldwide, accessed June 21, 2011 at http://www.piworldwide.com. (This case is based on press release-type information on the company’s website. Phone: 800-832-8884 or [email protected] .)
Virtual Teams in Action: Building the F-35 Fighter The F-35 Lighting II Program, also known as the Joint Fighter Program, is the U.S. Department of Defense’s next generation stealth fighter aircraft. The Department of Defense named Lockheed Martin Aeronautics of Fort Worth, Texas, to design and build the fighter with Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems as major partners Countries, including Italy, Australia, Canada, Turkey, India, and Israel, have contributed toward development costs of the program. The success of the mega project hinges greatly on intricate teamwork and the cooperation of countless individuals. For example, more than 80 suppliers worked at 187 locations worldwide to build components for the fighter. A seventy-five member technology group at Lockheed’s aeronautics division linked the suppliers along with the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marines to Britain’s Defense Ministry to track progress and make midstream design and production changes. Individuals working at more than 40,000 computer stations collaborated to get the first plane airborne in just four years. Speaking of the teamwork involved, Mark Peden, vice president for information systems at Lockheed Aeronautics, said, “It’s the true virtual connection.” Teams working both nationally and internationally were connected as if team members were working in the same room. Teams communicated via their computers while looking at shared documents, carried on e-mail chats, and used electronic whiteboards on which geographically separated team members could draw pictures or charts, in real time, as others watched and responded. The Internet was designed to allow people from different companies with incompatible computing systems to interface on websites that speak a common language. Questions 1. What advantages did Lockheed Martin gain by using virtual teams? Explain. 2. Identify and discuss potential problems with using virtual teams—for example, interpersonal, technical, or geographical concerns. 3. Discuss the characteristics that virtual team members should possess. 4. What specific training should virtual teams receive?